Wallace and one other reading-Using the David Foster Wallace reading Consider the Lobster do people as a culture and/or as independent thinkers have a moral obligation to consider the way animals are treated in our food system? Why or why not?-Even though most average people do not directly cause any harm to animals should they feel at all responsible for supporting an industry that does?- Is it morally okay to eat animals knowing it is not as Wallace notes necessary for our survival?-We know from the readings that animals are abused during the process of being harvested why is that a problem? Why should a person care? Or why not?4 pages MLA Support from the text must be used in every body paragraph
Criteria for Evaluation: Argument: Argument directly and fully answers the prompt; is clearly stated early in the
paper; is original compelling and logical avoiding absolute claims Evidence: Appropriate amount of relevant accurate and justifiably interpreted quotation. Quotations are thoroughly introduced explained analyzed and connected to argument. Possible counter-arguments are considered. Organization: Paragraphs maintain argumentative focus exclude extraneous information appear in a logical order and transition smoothly. Introduction sets forth argument and goals of essay. Conclusion opens up avenues for future research. Audience: Consistent academic tone. Appropriate amount of contextual information anticipating audience questions. Addresses significant issues and makes them important to audience. Grammar and Format: Errors in grammar spelling and usage limited or non-existent. Correct MLA format including proper quotation citation.