this homework consists of two parts(PLEASE DON’T USE ANY EXTERNAL SOURCES ) use your own words and the attached files to help you.
part One: response
Is there any reason to prefer one ethical theory above the rest? What are the best objections to each of the theories and how could an advocate of the theories defend them from the objections? Identify common ground on which moral decision-making can proceed. In your responnse consider the subtleties of Kan’t main formulations of the categorical imperitive including his emphasis on moral motivation and respect for persons.
Your response should be a minimum of 100 words
* to make it easier for this part use onlythe slides attached.
part Two: journal
Please read the Case Study #2.1 Hacking into Harvard on page 83 of your text. Discuss several of the socialand psychological factors that can effect moral decision making in this case. In your response discernbetween ethical egoism and psychological egoism as well as between utilitarianism andKantianism.
(minimum 200 words)
* for this part I have attached the case it’s only 1 page two sides.