EVIDENCE LAW

Introduction

According to the Saudi Arabian law, the evidence as something used so by courts to prove. Even to the disprove occurrence of a fact investigated.  It happens in a way in which the plaintiff of the case has to show the criminal offense’s existence against the defendant. Moreover, the defendant is also obligated by law to provide factors like to confirm the non-existence of the alleged crime to the court[1].Nevertheless, the most shocking feature of character evidence law is that the courts might not view some facts considered by the complainant and defendant as evidence. Under the Saudi Arabian evidence law, the evidence is presented in the court to prove or even disprove a fact shown by either plaintiff or defendant. Preciously, evidence law can also b as information that feeds the courts with adequate information. The information may be very vital when it comes to the excellent settling of disputes in courts. Evidence character law may also include proof concerning the moral behaviors of an individual, traits of the person, and reputation. In this essay, I would explore points on character evidence law and listing some of the merits.

Body

  The character witness makes the testimony on the reputations—even the habits of another person in court. For instance, character evidence law applied in cases that have criminal nature. In such a criminal case, the defendant always tries to reduce his or her chances of being convicted. Consequently, in criminal cases, the defendant is allowed by the law to bring facts likely to show an excellent reputation for such matters. Otherwise, such testimonials are not sufficient in all cases. In the embezzlement case, the defendant’s trustworthiness might be of use, unlike in other cases[2]. The law demands that the person who provides the character of the defendant. However, they must have been conversant with the initial behaviors before the crime committed.

In civil cases, character evidence is not of great importance. In defamation cases, the bad reputation of the plaintiff proved. The approval can be through damages mitigation, subject to proof of exemplary character[3]. Character evidence is very crucial in both criminal and civil cases as it brings the truthfulness. Evidence character is of great importance since it is what judges in courts need to come up with a judgment on instances. Besides, there can be no justice done in the absence of evidence. The provision of evident character to courts makes the court to go by either the facts. The defendant or the plaintiff gives the rule.  In the process of searching for truth, one’s constitution given rights violated.  Remarkably, evidence issued through ways against the law may lead to divided sides of enforcing justice.

The law of evidence is useful in both civil and criminal cases as a proof process. In both criminal and civil cases, there are platforms with legitimate ways of establishing truthful proofs. Besides, layers also can litigate and advise their clients appropriately on what needs to enforce. Evidence law is also essential since it has a moral purpose, such as regulation of rules related to proceedings held in courts. The moral aspect of evidence law plays a crucial role in criminal cases as it brings the guilty persons to the justice and sets the innocent free. Even though, in some situations, interests of the wider public may be hindered by rules governing interest laws. Defendant’s rights of getting fair trials in the courts of law are protected by the evidence law provisions, especially in criminal cases[4]. The only problem of applying the set rules and guidelines of evidence character law is that it fails to elaborate on the kind of valid evidence. The challenge has seen divided minds when it comes to evidence law application.

Researchers such as Bethan long discovered that the best way of attaining the truth was when free proof used. The research showed that judges could in delivering verdicts that are factual, given the truthful evidence. In Bethan’s view, placing many rules for evidence law leads to many shreds of evidence. In return, the attempt to search for the truth. Consequently, Bethan led in the fight towards the removal of some evidence laws[5]. Bethan had the feeling that evidence was only vital at the point where there was a need to avoid expenses and time. Therefore, the researcher felt a lack of evince as could not change the truth found by the judges using different ways. The supports of evidence law did not welcome the theory. They argued that it would be undesirable, especially when judges are not sure of the type of evidence to be brought .otherwise, much time may by the judges hence resulting in a delay of justice for individuals.

When it comes to the delivery of justice promptly, evidence low is the best. Evidence law is crucial since it ensures the evinces provided are not doubtful. In some exceptional cases, the law demands the exclusion of evidence, which is mandatory hence enable judges to have discretion on matters. The elimination of proof is to ensure fair trials as required by the case. Suppose relevant evidence in evidence law. It is not regarded as discretion as it I at the provision of truth and justice. Collection of prejudicial evidence that is not reliable leads to error in justice administration due to wrong conclusions. The symbolic importance of trials and rights, which are procedural, are ignored by the free proof concept—the courts’ moral legitimacy by the fundamental principle that safeguards the constitutional rights of individuals. The law states that the code, but people are supposed to of the performance. Ideally, that is the main reason why trials in public. Hence, the audience is supposed to have faith in the court’s verdict concerning different cases. Every individual has the right to fair trials about evidence law.

Conclusion

Evidence characters are behaviors of an individual provided before the court to show the possibility of crime occurrence. Evidence can be presented in the court to prove or even disprove a fact filed by either plaintiff or defendant. Preciously, evidence law can also serve as information that feeds the courts with adequate information. The information may be very vital when it comes to the excellent settling of disputes in courts[6]. In the embezzlement case, the defendant’s trustworthiness might be of use, unlike in other cases. The law demands that the person who provides the defendant’s character must have been conversant with the initial behaviors before the crime. Placing many rules for evidence law leads to many pieces of evidence. In return, the attempt to search for the truth could.

Consequently, Bethan led in the fight towards the removal of some evidence laws. The moral legitimacy of the courts by the fundamental principle which safeguards the constitutional rights of individuals. The law states that the code, but people are supposed to of the performance. Ideally, that is the main reason why trials in public. Generally, evidence law plays a very crucial role in the requirement of timely justice.

Bibliography

Vogel F, Saudi Business Law In Practice (Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 2019)

Alkhtani S, The Relevance Of International Financial Reporting Standards To Saudi Arabia (University of Stirling 2010)

Ferrara S, Boscolo-Berto R, and Viel G, Personal Injury And Damage Ascertainment Under Civil Law (Springer International Publishing 2016)

Emon A, Religious Pluralism And Islamic Law (OUP Oxford 2012)