Final Project – Argumentative Essay
PLEASE DO NOT SUBMIT A BID FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND EDUCATION TERMS AND CONCEPTS.ALL DIRECTIONS MUST BE FOLLOWEDAND NO PLAGARIASM. MY SCHOOL USES SOFTWARE TO DETECT COPIED MATERIAL.
ALL QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED COMPLETEY
In the Week Three Assignment you engaged in a case analysis of a current business problem using some of the components of an argumentative essay. In this written assignment you will write a complete argumentative essay as described in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 ofWith Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking(Foster Hardy & Ziga y Postigo 2015). This essay will include a revised and polished version of your Week Three Assignment an objection to your thesis a rebuttal and concluding remarks. In order to benefit the most you should start working on your Final Project from the time you receive your Week Three Assignment back with comments from your professor.
Your assignment should include the following:
Thesis:whether employers should be responsible for discrimination you will have to improve the wording.
A revision of your Week Three Case Analysis Assignment. Your revision should represent a substantial edit of your work that fully incorporates feedback from your professor and goes well beyond correcting any grammatical or APA errors. The other paper is attached so you can make the corrections.
The strongest possible objection to your thesis. After the final paragraph of your Week Three Case Analysis Assignment start a new paragraph that introduces the strongest possible objection to your thesis. The considerations for this are detailed in Section 9.2 ofWith Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking(Hardy Foster & Ziga y Postigo 2015). Make sure to employ the appropriate language to introduce the objection such as some may object to my thesis as follows or according to [so and so] the thesis presented here fails to account for X [whatever he or she finds problematic]. You can find other language to do this of course but the key point here is to make sure that you indicate that someone else is speaking when presenting this objection.
It is also important to remember that you do research to discover good objections and not merely objections that are weak and thus easily rebutted. Look for peer-reviewed journal articles in the Ashford University Library full-text articles in Google Scholar or articles in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Present the opposing position fairly and in detail. This may take more than one paragraph.
A rebuttal. This is a refutation of the objection that you have just presented. Start this in a new paragraph following the objection paragraph(s). Once again follow the indications of Section 9.2 ofWith Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking(Hardy Foster & Ziga y Postigo 2015). You may point out an error in the objection. Or you may show that while it is an important objection it does not apply squarely to your argument or does not account for facts that make it irrelevant. Above all make sure to maintain philosophical decorum in your rebuttal. Toward this end you should apply the principles of charity and of accuracy first introduced in the Week One course material. See Confronting Disagreement in Section 9.4 ofWith Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking(Hardy Foster & Ziga y Postigo 2015).
Closing remarks. End your argumentative essay with a paragraph of closing remarks. Provide some reflections of what you have attempted to achieve by means of your essay. You could for example explain how your essay sheds light on the broader controversy that it addresses. Or you could point out how your essay addresses a frequently ignored point or the unpopular side in the controversy. You could also reflect on the related matters in the broader controversy that would be useful to examine by others. Do not merely summarize what you have done in the body of your essay and do not add new information here that would support or contradict your essay since the body of your essay should have addressed all the relevant points. See Closing Your Essay in Section 9.2 ofWith Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking(Hardy Foster & Ziga y Postigo (2015).
Requirements for your Assignment:
Your assignment should be1400 wordsin length excluding the cover and references pages.
Your examination should be both thorough and succinct. This is a combination that demands time and thought so give yourself sufficient time to draft and revise.
Your assignment should include citations as well as a list of references. Both must be in APA form.
Your references should includeat least four peer-reviewed articles in addition to those that you will be carrying over from our Week Three Case Analysis Assignment.These references should be drawn from the Ashford University Library Google Scholar or the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Your assignment should be submittedno later than the end of Monday (midnight U.S. Mountain time).