Read Katz v. United States 389 U.S. 347 (1967) (attached) and explain the historical role of the trespass doctrine in Fourth Amendment considerations (in other words what did the doctrine allow?) and identify the dissent’s reasoning for believing that wiretapping should be outside of the purview of the Fourth Amendment. What is your opinion as to whether phone conversations should be protected by the Fourth Amendment? Explain
Must be 2-3 paragraphs. Due by Friday April 21 2017 @ 6:00pm central standard time United States. NOT PAYING FOR ANYTHING AFTER 6:00PM CT. If additional sources are used PLEASE SITE ALL SOURCES. The case is attached as a PDF.